 |
Information
about the research activities of the Language and Cognition program.
Some related links are:
Research
Programmatic
interests
Resources
Discoveries
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Neural Correlates of
Phonological and Semantic Training
Key Finding:
The figure on the left depicts the modulation
in neural activation that specifically resulted from attending to the
orthographic (left), phonological (center), or semantic (right)
features of repeatedly presented pseudowords. These findings converge
with others in revealing that a variety of cortical regions are
differentially involved in the processing of phonological and semantic
information and suggest that the putative visual word form area in the
occipitotemporal/fusiform region is sensitive to the phonological
properties of words and pseudowords.
|
Reference:
Sandak, R., Mencl, W.E., Frost, S.J., Rueckl,
J.G., Katz, L., Moore, D., Mason, S.A., Fulbright, R.K., and Constable,
R,T., (2004). The Neurobiology of Adaptive Learning in Reading: A
Contrast of Different Training Conditions. Cognitive, Affective,
and Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 66-88.
|
Reference Abstract:
fMRI was used to investigate the separate
influences of orthographic, phonological, and semantic
processing on the ability to learn new words and the cortical circuitry
recruited to subsequently read
those words. In a behavioral session, subjects acquired familiarity for
three sets of pseudowords, attending
to orthographic, phonological, or (learned) semantic features. Transfer
effects were measured
in an event-related fMRI session as the subjects named trained
pseudowords, untrained pseudowords,
and real words. Behaviorally, phonological and semantic training
resulted in better learning than did
orthographic training. Neurobiologically, orthographic training did not
modulate activation in the main
reading regions. Phonological and semantic training yielded equivalent
behavioral facilitation but distinct
functional activation patterns, suggesting that the learning resulting
from these two training conditions
was driven by different underlying processes. The findings indicate
that the putative ventral visual
word form area is sensitive to the phonological structure of words,
with phonologically analytic
processing contributing to the specialization of this region.
|
|